A lady from Lahore has been sentenced to loss of life by a periods courtroom after claiming to be a prophet, Wajid Ahmad Sheikh reported for Dawn. She has been charged below part 295C of Pakistan Penal Code (PPC). The courtroom has additionally fined the convict with Rs50,000.
“It’s proved past cheap doubt that accused Salma Tanveer wrote and distributed the writings that are derogatory in respect of Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and she or he didn’t show that her case falls in exception supplied by part 84 of PPC,” dominated Further District & Classes Decide Mansoor Ahmad Qureshi in his 22-page verdict.
Part 84 offers with crimes dedicated by those that are psychological.
A case against Salma Tanveer was registered at Nisthar Colony Police Station in 2013.
The courtroom document reveals that the FIR was lodged by the prayer chief (Khateeb) of Jamia Masjid Anwar-e-Madina in Bahadurabad neighbourhood of Lahore. The prayer chief, Qari Iftikhar Ahmad Raza, alleged that Salma Tanveer, principal of an area college, had revealed and distributed pamphlets within the space “whereby she denied khatam-e-nubuwat of the Holy Prophet (PBUH)”.
The FIR alleged that the girl had used derogatory remarks and claimed “her personal nubuwat”, in response to the courtroom document.
The girl’s counsel, Mian Muhammad Ramzan, had argued that the suspect was of unsound thoughts on the time of prevalence. He mentioned the Justice of the Peace involved had ordered psychological examination of the suspect, which remained pending with none fault on the a part of the suspect.
The defence counsel additional argued that the comparability of writing from photocopies was not potential as tampering had been made within the photocopies of the alleged paperwork.
A report by the Punjab Institute of Psychological Well being (PIMH) declared Salma Tanveer match to face trial.
“The query, nevertheless, that arises for consideration is whether or not in regulation such abnormality might be handled as enough to exculpate the accused for the intense crime dedicated by her, regardless that it falls in need of authorized madness,” held the decide.
The decide dominated that the regulation within the nation didn’t recognise such lesser types of psychological abnormality and the plea of diminished duty was not out there as a defence in a legal prosecution.